×

Warning

The form #5 does not exist or it is not published.

Displaying items by tag: hereditary peers

MPs have supported a bill to remove hereditary peers from the House of Lords, which currently reserves 92 seats for individuals who inherit their titles. The bill, passed by 435 votes to 73, now moves to the Lords, where it faces opposition. Conservatives argue that the move aims to replace scrutinising peers with Labour appointees. Some MPs proposed additional reforms, including removing CofE bishops from the Lords, but these were rejected. Liberal Democrat and SNP representatives pushed for a fully elected House of Lords, while Labour’s manifesto suggests introducing a retirement age and eventually replacing the Lords with a representative second chamber. Cabinet office minister Ellie Reeves defended the Government’s approach, saying hereditary seats contradict modern principles of fairness. Critics within the Lords, however, view the bill as politically motivated and detrimental to the chamber’s role in scrutinising government actions.

Published in British Isles

The Government has introduced plans to remove hereditary peers from the House of Lords, a significant move towards reforming the British upper chamber. Hereditary peers, whose titles are passed down through family lines, have long been seen as an outdated feature of the UK’s political system. The plan, spearheaded by ministers, aims to gradually phase out these unelected members, promoting a more democratic and merit-based process for appointments. Proponents of the reform argue that the House of Lords should reflect modern society and uphold principles of equality, where positions are earned rather than inherited. Critics of hereditary peerages see them as a vestige of privilege that no longer aligns with contemporary governance. However, some traditionalists express concerns that removing hereditary peers could lead to further political interference in the House of Lords. The reform is part of a broader effort to modernise UK politics, with the goal of making the upper chamber more accountable, transparent, and representative of the people it serves.

Published in British Isles