A knowledgable friend who works in South Asia recently wrote: “The India/Pakistan border tension could case another war between these two countries. A report said that the next possible nuclear war would be between India and Pakistan.

The tension between these two countries greatly impacts the war in Afghanistan. Pakistan is strongly behind certain groups of the Afghan Taliban as they are “Pro Pakistan” and the present government is very “Pro India”. Pakistan does not want a hostile or Pro Indian government in its western border and the Taliban are very close to Pakistan. A reconciliation between the two countries could also bring big changes in Afghanistan and even in Pakistan.

As you all know the problems go all the way back when Pakistan was started and it was born in the blood of more than a million people.”

Please pray for His peace, reconciliation and that these two nations will work through their differences and become friends.

Insight - As Afghanistan endgame looms, a deadly edge to India-Pakistan rivalry

Reuters

By Frank Jack Daniel and Sanjeev Miglani

Tues Aug 13, 2013

BARAMULLA/NEW DELHI, India

Pakistan-based militants are preparing to take on India across the subcontinent once Western troops leave Afghanistan next year, several sources say, raising the risk of a dramatic spike in tensions between nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan.

Intelligence source in India believe that a botched suicide bombing of an Indian consulate in Afghanistan, which was followed within days last week by a lethal cross-border ambush on Indian soldiers in disputed Kashmir, suggest that the new campaign by Islamic militants may already be underway.

Members of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) militant outfit in Pakistan, the group blamed for the 2008 commando-style raid on Mumbai that killed 166 people, told Reuters they were preparing to take the fight to India once again, this time across the region.

And a U.S. counter-terrorism official, referring to the attack in Afghanistan, said "LeT has long pursued Indian targets, so it would be natural for the group to plot against them in its own backyard".

Given the quiet backing - or at least blind eye - that many militant groups enjoy from Pakistan's shadowy intelligence services, tensions from a new militant campaign are bound to spill over. Adding to the volatility, the two nations' armies are trading mortar and gunfire across the heavily militarised frontier that divides Kashmir, and accusing each other of killing troops.

Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan have fought three wars since independence in 1947 and came close to a fourth in 1999. The tension now brewing may not escalate into open hostilities, but it could thwart efforts to forge a lasting peace and open trade between two countries that make up a quarter of the world's population.

"With the Americans leaving Afghanistan, the restraint on the Pakistani security/jihadi establishment is going too," said a former top official at India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), the external intelligence arm.

"We are concerned about 2014 in either scenario. If the jihadis (Islamist militants) claim success in Afghanistan, they could turn their attention to us. Equally, if they fail, they will attack in wrath."

But Pakistan, which has a border with India to the east and with Afghanistan to the west, has concerns of its own. It sees India's expansive diplomacy in Afghanistan as a ploy to disrupt it from the rear as it battles its own deadly Islamist militancy and separatist forces. Vying for influence in a post-2014 Afghanistan, it worries about India's assistance to the Afghan army, heightening a sense of encirclement.

"I'm shocked by these allegations. Pakistan has its own insurgency to deal with. It has no appetite for confrontations abroad," said a Pakistani foreign ministry official referring to the Indian charges of stirring trouble in Afghanistan and on the Kashmir border.

"If anything, we are looking at our mistakes from the past very critically. These accusations are baseless. India needs to act with more maturity and avoid this sort of propaganda."

Both U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry spoke during visits to India recently of the need for New Delhi and Islamabad to resume their stalled peace process as the region heads into a period of uncertainty.

FULL-SCALE JIHAD

At the core of that uncertainty is the pullback of militants from Afghanistan as U.S. forces head home.

Hafiz Sayeed, founder of the LeT, has left no doubt that India's side of Kashmir will become a target, telling an Indian weekly recently: "Full-scale armed Jihad (holy war) will begin soon in Kashmir after American forces withdraw from Afghanistan."

The retreat of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989 brought a wave of guerrillas into Kashmir to fight India's rule there.

This time the additional risk will be the rivalry between India and Pakistan over Afghanistan itself, one that threatens to become as toxic as the 60-year dispute in Kashmir. The LeT has said it is fighting Indian forces in Afghanistan as well. LeT was founded in 1990 in eastern Afghanistan by Sayeed, a Pakistani Islamic scholar whom India accuses of masterminding the rampage in Mumbai. The United States placed a $10 million bounty on his head for his alleged role in the attack, but he remains a free man in Pakistan, where he preached to thousands last week.

Please pray for the arrest and prosecution of this evil man and the dissolution of his terrorist organization, the LeT.

To read full article see:

http://origin.library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1104104269157-461/9-PeshBlast-kl.pdf

Here are some main themes and requests that we hope you can continue to hold up in prayer before the Lord until we see His transforming justice come for both countries (remember the persevering widow of Luke 18):

Pakistan

The honeymoon time between the newly-elected government and the Taliban is over. The Taliban have killed over 1700 people in the last couple of months and broken out 248 of their colleagues from prison.

The government seems to be afraid to do anything out of fear of retaliation.

• Pray that the government will boldly take action and bring down the Taliban for their own security and the good of the nation.

• Pray that the Taliban leaders will repent or otherwise be stopped and that their followers will be disheartened and demoralized, thrown also into disunity and confusion like King Jehoshaphat witnessed when God through Judah’s enemies into conflict with one another in 2 Chron.20.

• Pray that the “strong men” (the pirs who are spirit mediums), the spirit beings they offer blood sacrifice to, as well as the occult shrines where they operate will be bound according to Jesus’ promise Matthew 18:18.

• Pray Pray for the local intercessors and Christian leaders to take on the spiritual responsibility of praying for their land in unity and faith with others. Like David, may they take the spiritual battle to the Goliath they face that is destroying their land!

Afghanistan

The good news is that the Taliban attacks have diminished and there has been some decrease in the fighting. Bombs have gone off prematurely, saving many. However, over 600 soldiers and police have been killed recently. Government officials are also being targeted with their families, which is discouraging for them. We are thankful to report that the Taliban’s “peace meetings” have fallen apart since they would have most likely led to a sell-out of the country to these radicals by the departing coalition forces.

• Pray for the national elections that the right people, especially the right person for president, will be chosen through the selection process that begins next month and ends on Oct.6. The actual election will be on April 5.

• Pray that the Taliban will experience massive demoralization and quit fighting, overcome by warweariness after so much bloodshed and fighting.

• Pray that the Pushtun tribe, 400 of whose tribal leaders have been killed, will reject and drive out the Taliban from using their territories.

• Pray for the Kabul prayer initiative happening from Aug. 17-22, that encouragingly is being led by local believers. May they and other believers in the country arise and do exploits for the Lord, full of faith and unity, wielding His authority to drive the spiritual forces of evil from their land!

Thanks for standing with us for the deliverance of both nations through the power of the Lord, mediated through united prayer of His people, both ours and the local believers.

North Korea’s nuclear weapons test on February 12th was its third and most powerful to date. According to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s state-controlled news agency, the test was carried out “using a miniaturized and lighter nuclear device with greater explosive force than previously.” It was a wake-up call for some in the arms control community who have dismissed Pyongyang’s nuclearization merely as a bargaining chip for monetary or material concessions and against regime change. The North Koreans are now playing in the big leagues, with a warhead small enough to be used on an intercontinental ballistic missile that, according to the regime, could potentially strike not only US bases in South Korea and Japan, but also Guam and the US mainland. Those who ritualistically condemned the test also ignored one of the issues that it was meant to obscure: while spending billions on its nuclear program, the Kim regime, in continuity with its dynastic predecessors, was also presiding over a stateinduced famine and mass atrocities within its prison camp system that have taken on the proportions of a homemade genocide.

The February test was a clear reminder of the failure of Western diplomatic efforts to deal with Pyongyang. More than two decades of engagement and negotiation with the DPRK on security issues, efforts that have relegated the mass atrocity occurring within the country to a low-level status, have not only borne no fruit but, for the increasing millions who suffer from starvation and other atrocities, have provided a diplomatic cover that obscures their suffering. Even the United Nations, usually timorous in its criticisms of North Korea, has tried to start a conversation about the famine-genocide. On January 14, 2013, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay called for an international inquiry into what “may amount to crimes against humanity” in the DPRK. On February 1st, a report addressed to the UN Human Rights Council from the current UN special rapporteur on human rights in North Korea, Marzuki Darusman, repeated the call for a probe into the Kim regime’s “grave, systematic, and widespread” human rights abuses.

Previous UN reports and resolutions have concentrated on nine patterns of human rights violations: violation of the right to food; torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment; arbitrary detention as a form of persecution; violations of human rights associated with the prison camps; discrimination particularly targeting women, children, people living with disabilities, repatriated refugees, and those disfavored by the government; extensive violation of freedom of expression and other related freedoms; violation of the right to life, public executions, and the abusive application of the death penalty; restrictions on freedom of movement and abuse of repatriated defectors; and enforced disappearances, including the abductions of foreign nationals. Now, Special Rapporteur Darusman is saying that many if not all of these patterns of violation may amount to crimes against humanity as defined under Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. During the twenty-second regular session of the UN Human Rights Council (February 25th–March 22nd), a resolution sponsored by Japan and the European Union calling for a UN Commission of Inquiry into possible crimes against humanity in North Korea was passed unanimously, as China, Russia, and Cuba, traditional backers of the regime, are not a part of the body this year. In light of these major developments, and with recently surfaced reports of North Korea’s plan to conduct at least two more nuclear tests before the end of this year, in utter defiance of repeated, unequivocal warnings from the UN Security Council, it is time for the global community to fundamentally reassess policy on North Korea to focus on the unparalleled humanitarian and human rights emergency unfolding in the country today.

Since April of last year, Pyongyang has dramatically increased spending on its nuclear and missile program—resources that would have constituted more than enough to take care of food shortages within the country for more than a decade. This recent flurry of weapons tests comes at a time when North Korea’s famine is reportedly at one of the worst points in the nation’s anguished history. An October 2012 report from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) indicates that North Korea’s hunger situation is at the “serious” level, with its Global Hunger Index (GHI) at nineteen points. The DPRK’s hunger-increase rate from the 1990s, when one of the most devastating famines in the last century claimed the lives of between two and three and a half million people, is the highest in the world despite considerable international humanitarian assistance. Consistent with the findings of the IFPRI study, Japan’s Asia Press International, an organization that employs undercover North Korean journalists, issued a report in January of this year based on interviews conducted with numerous North Korean residents in North Korea and in China indicating rampant starvation and mass death.

In April 2012, the Tokyo Shimbun newspaper reported that “from December 2011 until April 2012, twenty thousand people have starved to death in South Hwanghae Province,” which is about ten percent of the area’s population. The article also states that “in some regions, over one thousand people starved to death in one day.” The South Korean humanitarian aid NGO “Good Friends” reported in its newsletter the same month that, according to statements by certain North Korean Workers’ Party officials, “in North and South Hwanghae Provinces, even grass does not remain (as it has been eaten).” According to reports, the current manifestation of famine has been caused by the forcible confiscation of food from farmers and their families to feed the military and the political elites. No longer can Pyongyang claim, as it has in the past, that natural disasters have caused the country’s humanitarian catastrophe. The UN’s former special rapporteur on human rights in North Korea, Vitit Muntarbhorn, stated categorically in his sixth and final report to the General Assembly, in 2010, that the DPRK, which has the largest per capita army and the highest military expenditures in the world  according to GDP, was not by any measure poor. Muntarbhorn noted that North Korea has very large mineral resources and generates billions in export and trade, but that the profits from this activity are being used entirely for militarization. He concluded, and has since reiterated in interviews, that the DPRK has the means to feed its people and that the real issue is not a lack of resources but the military-first policy and misappropriation of provisions (including the mass diversion of billions in international humanitarian aid) by the authorities.

Although lost in the static of diplomatic dithering over sanctions and other issues, North Korea’s mass atrocities against its people continue to be the subject of a vast and growing body of documentation. In recent years, the North Korean state has been found to be comprehensively violating the UN Genocide Convention by targeting for destruction every group protected by the international treaty while also employing every method defined as genocidal in Article 2. Genocide Watch, a nonpartisan NGO whose board of advisers includes respected anti-genocide activists such as the retired Canadian general Roméo Dallaire and Samantha Power (former senior director for multilateral affairs and human rights for the US National Security Council and President  Obama’s pick as the next US ambassador to the UN), published a report on December 19, 2011, stating that there is “ample proof that genocide has been committed and mass killing is still under way in North Korea.” Targeted groups protected under the Genocide Convention include the half-Chinese babies of North Korean women forcibly repatriated by China (constituting genocide on national, ethnic, and racial grounds) and the country’s indigenous religious population and their families (genocide on religious grounds). Yet a broader political genocide has claimed the lives of, and continues to victimize, several millions more.

Although North Korea’s status as a genocidal state is starting to become more widely accepted, it is not by any means new. In 2006, legal scholars David Scheffer and Grace Kang co-authored an op-ed for the International Herald Tribune titled “North Korea’s criminal regime,” which argued that the DPRK is responsible for “crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes” and recommended that “any Security Council resolution condemning North Korea’s weapons activities . . . should also condemn its human rights violations.” In the same year, lawyer Grace Kang, who has worked for the US Department of State, had published “A Case for the Prosecution of Kim Jong Il for Crimes against Humanity, Genocide, and War Crimes,” a study which concluded that “published facts indicate a reasonable basis to believe that Kim Jong Il, who controls the DPRK absolutely, is individually liable for crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes.”

Yet these searing condemnations have until now been met with an international yawn. Never in the post - Holocaust era, in fact, has an ongoing genocide been treated with such negligence and insouciance. Not only have millions of North Koreans died in a state-organized famine, but masses continue to suffer unrestrained violence and brutality in the country’s prison camps, where an estimated quarter of a million political prisoners, one-third of them children, are currently being forced to perform slave labor and are routinely subjected to systematic torture and rape, brutal forced abortions and infanticide, biological and chemical weapons experiments, and summary executions. Over the last decade, outside observers and humanitarian activists have repeatedly stated that North Korea’s prison camps represent the  worst abuse of human rights in the world today. According to satellite images and a growing body of defector testimony, including that of former prison camp guards who were personally responsible for many of these atrocities, slavery, heinous abuses, and mass murder continue unabated while these camps are getting larger year by year.

Only the handful of North Koreans brave or lucky enough to escape their country have found a way out of the hellish nightmare. Although fewer than one in ten who attempt to flee succeed, thousands try every year, some of them managing somehow to scrape together the several thousands of dollars that can be required to bribe border guards and be spirited out of the country.

Most of the refugees aim to eventually head for South Korea, where they are welcomed. The situation is grim, though, and because of the virtually impassable Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), refugees are forced to head toward the Chinese border first. North Korea’s patron state has kept its agreements with the DPRK under a 1961 treaty and a subsequent 1986 border protocol that specifies that all North Koreans found within Chinese territory without permission from the Pyongyang government are to be forcibly repatriated. Many defectors have said that while in China they would carry either arsenic or a razor with them in case they were caught by Chinese police, reasoning that it would be better to die than face what awaits them when they are returned home: incarceration in a concentration camp, torture — particularly brutal for those repatriated North Korean women who are discovered to be carrying the babies of Chinese nationals or those discovered to have had contact with South Korean nationals or religious believers—and, in other instances, public execution.

Always hazardous, attempted escape from North Korea has become even more dangerous over the past few years. Following the death of his father, the DPRK under Kim Jong-un’s leadership declared it would carry out “immediate executions when people are caught trying to cross the borders” and pledged to hunt down and imprison escapees, and even to kill three generations of family members of North Koreans who attempt to leave the country, whether they succeed or not. The regime has apparently kept its word, leading to a sharp decrease (about forty-four percent) in the number of North Koreans who made it to South Korea in 2012.

One ray of light in this dark situation has been the financial remittances sent home by North Korean refugees abroad. It is estimated that more than half of the twenty-four thousand refugees residing in South Korea today regularly and effectively send money to their family members, friends, or acquaintances still trapped in the North. According to a January 2011 survey from the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights, the average amount sent per defector is about 1 million won annually, or $920. Cash remittances do not travel through official channels but via paid brokers who also help smuggle people, messages, and items in and out of North Korea. The transaction fee is about twenty-one to thirty percent of the total. About ninety percent of defectors say they receive confirmation from the recipient verifying they have received the money. The refugees know that the money they send can mean the difference between death and survival, since $1,000 is enough to feed a family on the outside of a prison camp in the North for one year.

If international humanitarian NGOs , religious groups, philanthropists, and other concerned persons and organizations got behind these defectors in an organized manner to increase the money entering North Korea through unofficial channels, the effects could be transformative. In addition to relieving unparalleled human misery, these remittances could weaken the loyalty of security forces and the military to the Kim regime, as more and more people realize they have been lied to about the outside world and that they are being viciously exploited by a very small minority. Such a program could do more to isolate and weaken the Pyongyang government while empowering the common people, eventually leading to the end of the regime. Supporting the North Korean refugees is one of the few open avenues we have to facilitate positive change in North Korea and contribute to the dismantling of this criminal and genocidal system.

International inaction in the face of the DPRK’s crimes against the humanity of its own people has become more and more disgraceful with each passing year. The argument has been made that the global community’s failure to act in behalf of millions of North Korean victims over such a prolonged period of time could constitute complicity. At the 2005 UN World Summit, government leaders from around the world made a solemn commitment to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. More than any other country, North Korea has been allowed to commit mass atrocities in defying this call. Many observers, myself included, believe that what is now required is for members of the global community to apply the Responsibility to Protect doctrine and principle, which has been used to justify intervention in arguably far less urgent situations in the world, to North Korea. At bare minimum, this would mean making the regime’s genocidal policies toward its own people a firstorder issue in all backdoor diplomacy about nuclear energy and weaponry, and in all bilateral or multilateral discussions and initiatives concerning North Korea.

North Korea’s nuclear weaponization and its crimes against its own people are the conjoined twins of the Kim dynasty. They can no longer be treated by the rest of the world as separable and unrelated issues.

Robert Park is a minister, human rights activist, and founding member of the non-partisan Worldwide Coalition to Stop Genocide in North Korea, a nonprofit working to provide life-saving resources to victims and their families within North Korea. For more information, visit www.robertparkofficial.com.

Please continue to pray for His deliverance for those who suffer so horrifically under the regime of Kim Jong Un and for the transformation of this genocidal state.